Vox Viridis http://www.vox-viridis.com The Sustainable Legal Voice posterous.com Sun, 07 Feb 2010 09:00:00 -0800 FTC Warns 78 Retailers, Including Wal-Mart, Target, and Kmart, to Stop Labeling and Advertising Rayon Textile Products as "Bamboo" http://www.vox-viridis.com/ftc-warns-78-retailers-including-wal-mart-tar http://www.vox-viridis.com/ftc-warns-78-retailers-including-wal-mart-tar

FTC Warns 78 Retailers, Including Wal-Mart, Target, and Kmart, to Stop Labeling and Advertising Rayon Textile Products as "Bamboo"

Seventy-eight companies nationwide have received Federal Trade Commission letters warning that they may be breaking the law by selling clothing and other textile products that are labeled and advertised as �bamboo,� but actually are made of manufactured rayon fiber. The letters, which the agency�s staff sent last week, make the retailers aware of the FTC�s concerns about possible mislabeling of rayon products as �bamboo,� so the companies can take corrective steps to avoid Commission action.

�We need to make sure companies use proper labeling and advertising in their efforts to appeal to environmentally conscious consumers,� said David C. Vladeck, Director of the agency�s Bureau of Consumer Protection. �Rayon is rayon, even if bamboo has been used somewhere along the line in the manufacturing process.�

The FTC sued several companies last year for allegedly selling products labeled or advertised as �bamboo� that in reality were made of rayon. Rayon is a man-made fiber created from the cellulose found in plants and trees and processed with harsh chemicals that release hazardous air pollution. Any plant or tree � including bamboo � could be used as the cellulose source, but the fiber that is created is rayon.

�While we have seen action by some retailers to correct mislabeled clothing and textile products, our hope is that these warning letters will serve as a wake-up call to all companies, regardless of their size,� Vladeck said.

The FTC staff letter outlines the requirements for proper labeling and advertising of textile products derived from bamboo. The letter states, �Rayon, even if manufactured using cellulose from bamboo, must be described using an appropriate term recognized under the FTC�s Textile Rules. . . . Failing to properly label and advertise textiles misleads consumers and runs afoul of both the Textile Rules and the FTC Act.�

In the letter, the FTC tells the companies they should review the labeling and advertising for the textile products they are selling and remove or correct any misleading bamboo references.

Along with the warning letters, the agency sent each company a synopsis of FTC decisions finding that the failure to use proper fiber names in textile labeling and advertising was deceptive and violated the FTC Act. Under the Act, the FTC can seek civil penalties of up to $16,000 per violation against any company that receives this information but fails to correct its advertising and labeling.

A complete list of the companies sent warning letters can be found on the FTC�s Web site and as a link to this press release. They include small and large retailers, with both online and brick-and-mortar stores, and firms selling textile products labeled or advertised as �bamboo� that may be made of rayon. The more commonly known retailers include:

Amazon.com, Barney�s New York, Bed Bath & Beyond, BJ�s Wholesale Club, Bloomingdale�s, Costco Wholesale, Garnet Hill, Gold Toe, Hanes, Isotoner, JC Penney, Jockey,
Kmart, Kohl�s, Land�s End, Macy�s, Maidenform, Nordstrom, Overstock.com, QVC, REI, Saks Fifth Avenue, Sears, Shop NBC, Spiegel, Sports Authority, Target, The Gap, The Great Indoors, Tommy Bahama, Toys R� Us, Wal-Mart, and Zappos.com.

Recent Enforcement Actions. Today�s announcement comes on the heels of four FTC enforcement actions brought against companies selling rayon products that were misleadingly labeled and advertised. According to the Commission�s complaints, filed in August 2009, the companies falsely claimed that their rayon clothing and other textile products were �bamboo fiber,� marketing them using names such as �ecoKashmere,� �Pure Bamboo,� �Bamboo Comfort,� and �BambooBaby.� The complaints also challenged a number of other deceptive �green� claims, including that the products retained the bamboo plant�s antimicrobial properties, were made using environmentally friendly manufacturing processes, and are biodegradable.

The four companies have settled the FTC�s charges and agreed to modify their labels to ensure their claims are not misleading or deceptive. (One of the cases still needs final FTC approval.) Press releases announcing the complaints and related settlements can be found at: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/12/dynabamboo.shtm and http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/bamboosa.shtm, respectively.

Business and Consumer Information. The FTC has a publication designed to help businesses that sell clothing and textile products that are labeled as bamboo to market their products in ways that are truthful, non-deceptive, and in compliance with the law. �Avoid Bamboo-zling Your Customers� can be found at http://www.ftc.gov/bamboo. The FTC also has an alert entitled �Have You Been Bamboozled by Bamboo Fabrics?� that provides useful information for consumers shopping for bamboo-based fabrics. It also can be found at http://www.ftc.gov/bamboo.

The Commission vote to publicly disclose the warning letters was 4-0. Copies of the letters and a complete list of companies that received them can be found on the FTC�s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov/bamboo and as a link to this press release.

The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, click: http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/complaint.shtm or call 1-877-382-4357. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,700 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. For free information on a variety of consumer topics, click http://ftc.gov/bcp/consumer.shtm.

This issue has come up before (Bamboozled Green Claims) and we'll keep an eye on this for future developments.  In the meantime, be certain your company's green claims are true, not misleading and are substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence.  Let us know if we can help. 

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/188493/MB-Block.jpg http://posterous.com/people/4bmKsRJ6C3u1 William Broderick wjbroderick William Broderick
Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:35:00 -0800 A Type of Green Impact: Unexpected Regulation http://www.vox-viridis.com/a-type-of-green-impact-unexpected-regulation http://www.vox-viridis.com/a-type-of-green-impact-unexpected-regulation

 

I’ve said before that for a sustainable legal strategy and to avoid claims of greenwashing, a company’s claims must be true, not misleading, and substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence.  Add to this simple list: if you make a specific claim regarding the properties of your product, be sure to know whether that claim raises further regulatory requirements. 

 

 

Samsung manufactured keyboards that it claimed contained antimicrobial properties and could inhibit germs and bacteria.  If that claim was false, misleading or not backed up by evidence, Samsung could be in trouble with the Federal Trade Commission. FTC, however, is not who fined Samsung. 

 

The US Environmental Protection Agency regulates pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).  FIFRA requires that all pesticides be registered with the EPA so it can determine that the pesticide, when used in accordance with labeling directions, will not cause unreasonable adverse effects to human health or the environment.  

 

By claiming antimicrobial properties on the keyboard, the Samsung keyboard fell within the EPA’s broad definition of a pesticide: any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest, where a pest is living organisms that occur where they are not wanted or that cause damage to crops or humans or other animals, such as insects, mice and other animals, unwanted plants (weeds), fungi, or microorganisms such as bacteria and viruses. 

 

 

The failure to register the keyboard with the EPA under FIFRA cost Samsung a $205,000 fine. The fine was not based on the keyboards’ inability to fight off critters, just that it was not properly registered.  After having gone through the trouble on your own of verifying your green claims, providing extensive corroborating data and not making misleading statements, wouldn’t you hate to find out that your product is now regulated?  Have your claims reviewed by an experienced attorney.

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/188493/MB-Block.jpg http://posterous.com/people/4bmKsRJ6C3u1 William Broderick wjbroderick William Broderick
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:50:00 -0700 Greenwashing 10 Years Ago – How Far Have We Come? http://www.vox-viridis.com/greenwashing-10-years-ago-how-far-have-we-com http://www.vox-viridis.com/greenwashing-10-years-ago-how-far-have-we-com

To avoid greenwashing, your sustainable business needs to make ecological claims about its products or services that are true, not misleading, and substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence.

 

I came across an old study from Consumers International that highlighted some problems with green claims.  It has been ten years since this report.  Are consumers still seeing the same things:   

 

  1. Statements are often too general
  2. Statements which ought to be related to a product’s life-cycle frequently are not
  3. Statements tend to be too vague and unconvincing
  4. Statements do not give a real idea about the actual superiority of the product or its life- cycle
  5. Statements are often not relevant to the market in which the product is sold
  6. Claims are not verifiable
  7. There are far too many symbols and logos on products and packaging
  8. Because so many claims are made, and because those claims are not believed, people do not trust the official eco-labels either.

 

It is good to see some trusted names and sources entering the market place.  UL Environment provides independent green claims validation, product certification, training, advisory services and standards development for sustainable businesses.  I have no connection to Underwriters Laboratory other than I know the name from any lamp wires I have in my house and their headquarters is not far from my house so I’ve met a few engineers there who get to blow stuff up from time to time.

 

Credibility is key when it comes to making green claims for your sustainable business.  If you’ve been around for 163 years then there is a little weight to a validation from you.  If not, services like this one from UL will help….if your product has genuine sustainable attributes.

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/188493/MB-Block.jpg http://posterous.com/people/4bmKsRJ6C3u1 William Broderick wjbroderick William Broderick
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:36:00 -0700 Bamboozled Green Claims http://www.vox-viridis.com/bamboozled-green-claims http://www.vox-viridis.com/bamboozled-green-claims

One of the recognized strategies for avoiding greenwashing is to tell the truth.  The Federal Trade Commission recently charged four sellers of clothing and other textile products with deceptively labeling and advertising their items as made of bamboo fiber.  A nice “green” claim - except when they are made of rayon. Whoops. 

The complaints also charged the companies with making false and unsubstantiated “green” claims that their clothing and textile products were manufactured using an environmentally friendly process (making rayon can create a lot of environmental issues), that they retain the natural antimicrobial properties of the bamboo plant (which are lost in the rayon making process), and that they are biodegradable (rayon is not particularly biodegradable).  Rayon is made of cellulose that can be derived from bamboo, but apparently, the companies could not even substantiate that claim. 

 

The people that care enough about environmental claims to influence their purchasing decisions care about greenwashing.  For a sustainable legal strategy, be certain any of your company’s claims are true, not misleading, and substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence.

Permalink | Leave a comment  »

]]>
http://files.posterous.com/user_profile_pics/188493/MB-Block.jpg http://posterous.com/people/4bmKsRJ6C3u1 William Broderick wjbroderick William Broderick