Vox Viridis - The Sustainable Legal Voice
Filed under

Profit

 

FTC Warns 78 Retailers, Including Wal-Mart, Target, and Kmart, to Stop Labeling and Advertising Rayon Textile Products as "Bamboo"

FTC Warns 78 Retailers, Including Wal-Mart, Target, and Kmart, to Stop Labeling and Advertising Rayon Textile Products as "Bamboo"

Seventy-eight companies nationwide have received Federal Trade Commission letters warning that they may be breaking the law by selling clothing and other textile products that are labeled and advertised as �bamboo,� but actually are made of manufactured rayon fiber. The letters, which the agency�s staff sent last week, make the retailers aware of the FTC�s concerns about possible mislabeling of rayon products as �bamboo,� so the companies can take corrective steps to avoid Commission action.

�We need to make sure companies use proper labeling and advertising in their efforts to appeal to environmentally conscious consumers,� said David C. Vladeck, Director of the agency�s Bureau of Consumer Protection. �Rayon is rayon, even if bamboo has been used somewhere along the line in the manufacturing process.�

The FTC sued several companies last year for allegedly selling products labeled or advertised as �bamboo� that in reality were made of rayon. Rayon is a man-made fiber created from the cellulose found in plants and trees and processed with harsh chemicals that release hazardous air pollution. Any plant or tree � including bamboo � could be used as the cellulose source, but the fiber that is created is rayon.

�While we have seen action by some retailers to correct mislabeled clothing and textile products, our hope is that these warning letters will serve as a wake-up call to all companies, regardless of their size,� Vladeck said.

The FTC staff letter outlines the requirements for proper labeling and advertising of textile products derived from bamboo. The letter states, �Rayon, even if manufactured using cellulose from bamboo, must be described using an appropriate term recognized under the FTC�s Textile Rules. . . . Failing to properly label and advertise textiles misleads consumers and runs afoul of both the Textile Rules and the FTC Act.�

In the letter, the FTC tells the companies they should review the labeling and advertising for the textile products they are selling and remove or correct any misleading bamboo references.

Along with the warning letters, the agency sent each company a synopsis of FTC decisions finding that the failure to use proper fiber names in textile labeling and advertising was deceptive and violated the FTC Act. Under the Act, the FTC can seek civil penalties of up to $16,000 per violation against any company that receives this information but fails to correct its advertising and labeling.

A complete list of the companies sent warning letters can be found on the FTC�s Web site and as a link to this press release. They include small and large retailers, with both online and brick-and-mortar stores, and firms selling textile products labeled or advertised as �bamboo� that may be made of rayon. The more commonly known retailers include:

Amazon.com, Barney�s New York, Bed Bath & Beyond, BJ�s Wholesale Club, Bloomingdale�s, Costco Wholesale, Garnet Hill, Gold Toe, Hanes, Isotoner, JC Penney, Jockey,
Kmart, Kohl�s, Land�s End, Macy�s, Maidenform, Nordstrom, Overstock.com, QVC, REI, Saks Fifth Avenue, Sears, Shop NBC, Spiegel, Sports Authority, Target, The Gap, The Great Indoors, Tommy Bahama, Toys R� Us, Wal-Mart, and Zappos.com.

Recent Enforcement Actions. Today�s announcement comes on the heels of four FTC enforcement actions brought against companies selling rayon products that were misleadingly labeled and advertised. According to the Commission�s complaints, filed in August 2009, the companies falsely claimed that their rayon clothing and other textile products were �bamboo fiber,� marketing them using names such as �ecoKashmere,� �Pure Bamboo,� �Bamboo Comfort,� and �BambooBaby.� The complaints also challenged a number of other deceptive �green� claims, including that the products retained the bamboo plant�s antimicrobial properties, were made using environmentally friendly manufacturing processes, and are biodegradable.

The four companies have settled the FTC�s charges and agreed to modify their labels to ensure their claims are not misleading or deceptive. (One of the cases still needs final FTC approval.) Press releases announcing the complaints and related settlements can be found at: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/12/dynabamboo.shtm and http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/bamboosa.shtm, respectively.

Business and Consumer Information. The FTC has a publication designed to help businesses that sell clothing and textile products that are labeled as bamboo to market their products in ways that are truthful, non-deceptive, and in compliance with the law. �Avoid Bamboo-zling Your Customers� can be found at http://www.ftc.gov/bamboo. The FTC also has an alert entitled �Have You Been Bamboozled by Bamboo Fabrics?� that provides useful information for consumers shopping for bamboo-based fabrics. It also can be found at http://www.ftc.gov/bamboo.

The Commission vote to publicly disclose the warning letters was 4-0. Copies of the letters and a complete list of companies that received them can be found on the FTC�s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov/bamboo and as a link to this press release.

The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, click: http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/complaint.shtm or call 1-877-382-4357. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,700 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. For free information on a variety of consumer topics, click http://ftc.gov/bcp/consumer.shtm.

This issue has come up before (Bamboozled Green Claims) and we'll keep an eye on this for future developments.  In the meantime, be certain your company's green claims are true, not misleading and are substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence.  Let us know if we can help. 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Greenwashing   Profit  

Comments [0]

Triad Manufacturing - A Green Suppliers Network Success Story

Triad Manufacturing is a manufacturer of retail store fixtures used for displaying products. Triad's customers include Best Buy, Target, Banana Republic, Home Depot, and Pacific Sunwear.

The Situation:

Missouri Enterprise, a NIST Manufacturing Extension Partnership, approached Triad about participating in the Green Suppliers Network since they were aware that Triad routinely looked for opportunities to improve its operations.

David Goebel and Nick Hennen of Missouri Enterprise completed Triad's review in September 2008. Instead of focusing on one product or process line, Triad wanted to examine inefficiencies across its whole facility. The review team prepared high-level value stream maps that captured the entire system, from raw materials entering the facility to finished products exiting. The review process identified two primary opportunities: improved energy efficiency and increased recycling of byproducts.

The Solution:

Following the Green Suppliers Network review, Triad has succeeded in reducing its energy consumption by making four changes. The first two, capturing waste heat off its drying ovens and compressed air system for heating the facility during the winter months and installing infrared heaters to reduce the use of forced air heat, have saved the company an estimated $80,000 annually. The third, installing a new powder coating line, has decreased energy use for the powder coating process line by 40 percent and also reduced hazardous effluent by 10,000 gallons annually. Fourth, Triad implemented a leak detection program for its compressed air system that could potentially save an additional $25,000 annually.

Triad is also interested in recycling its sawdust and scrap wood pallets. The company is currently investigating the feasibility of sending its broken wood pallets to a company that manufactures wood pellets for heat. Recycling these wood pallets would eliminate a waste stream of 30,000 pounds annually.

Return to Success Stories

Triad incorporated Simple Ways to Reduce Waste and Save Money With Green Suppliers Network. Could your company do the same?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   EPA Partnerships   Planet   Practices   Profit   Sustainable Business  

Comments [0]

Simple Ways to Reduce Waste and Save Money With Green Suppliers Network

EPA-industry partnerships often have low costs and high benefits.  An example of a joint effort between the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to help small and medium-sized manufacturers stay competitive and profitable while reducing their impact on the environment is the Green Suppliers Network.  The Green Suppliers Network provides technical assistance and other tools and resources related to lean manufacturing, environmental improvement, energy efficiency, and chemical management. 

The program touts, among its benefits, that member companies can:

  • Find customized solutions to manufacturing challenges
  • Save money and increase capacity
  • See immediate results through hands-on training on the shop floor
  • Achieve additional savings and efficiencies beyond traditional lean techniques
  • Improve supply chain relationships

The Green Suppliers Network efforts focus on its Lean and Clean Advantage.  Lean and Clean attempts to go beyond traditional “lean” processes (defects, overproduction, waste, non-utilized people, transportation, inventory, motion, and extra processing) and instead includes environmental waste as a focus (nature-friendly substitutes, optimized material and energy efficiency, waste elimination, air/water emission reductions, solid/hazardous waste reduction, toxic material reduction or substitution, and efficient packaging).

 

With the Lean and Clean Advantage, manufacturers quantify:

  • Energy, water, or raw materials used in excess of what is needed to meet consumer needs.
  • Pollutants and material wastes released into the environment, such as air emissions, wastewater discharges, hazardous wastes, and solid wastes (trash or discarded scrap).
  • Hazardous substances that adversely affect human health or the environment during their use in production or presence in products.

Just over 100 companies nationwide have participated in the Green Suppliers Network.  Do you think your company could benefit from reduced waste, increased profits, a little subsidized green consulting and free publicity courtesy of the EPA?  The attorneys at Mayfield | Broderick can help make the Green Suppliers Network part of your sustainable business strategy.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   EPA Partnerships   Planet   Practices   Profit   Sustainable Business  

Comments [2]

The Lessons of “World Record” Sledding

(download)

 

I have been a lawyer for awhile but am new to having a blog (2 blogs actually, www.TheConstructionContractReview.com if you are interested).  Our sustainable legal practice at Mayfield | Broderick looks at how any given legal problem, transaction or dispute impacts people, planet and profits and asks: can there be improvements in those impacts?  Vox Viridis started about three months ago to provide commentary on this intersection between people, planet, profits and the law.

 

I took a few weeks off from this blogging thing to enjoy the last few weeks of 2009 with my family, wrap up a number of work items before the end of the year and take a much needed few days up in the north woods of Wisconsin.  Doing not much else than sledding gave me the opportunity to think about how sledding can provide lessons on how I write this blog, maintain my law practice, or how my clients can transition their businesses to sustainable or reduce the impacts from their legal activities. 

 

The Lessons of Sledding:

 

  1. Prepare – hat, scarf, sweater, warm coat, long underwear, snow pants, thick socks, good boots, and of course, snow are required
  2. Choose Your Tools – different sleds can provide different results: saucers, toboggans, disks, boats, tubes, or runner sleds.  
  3. Select Your Path – the path one chooses down the hill are critical: fast or bumpy, fresh track or glazed over slick snow, curly or straight path. 
  4. Settle In – are you on you back or stomach; sitting, kneeling, or curled up like a pretzel; holding on the sled or your fellow sledder?  These are essential elements to the sledding experience and occur on the top, with a foot or hand out so you don’t start down the hill too early. 
  5. Never Hurts to Get a Push
  6. Enjoy The Ride – screaming like a little girl seems best
  7. Set a Higher Goal – want to go farther, longer without crashing, or simply faster?  All good. 
  8. Don’t Be Afraid To Crash – perhaps the most critical element.  I’m sure there is some appropriate Thomas Edison quote to insert here. 

 

I took these lessons to heart while thinking about Vox Viridis for 2010.  I’ve prepared a calendar of different topics to post about including People: immigration, estate planning, and employment; Planet: clean technology, carbon markets, brownfield issues, environmental news, renewable energy, and emission reduction strategies; and Profits: EPA Partnerships, greenwashing, sustainability practices, and nonprofits.  I’m comfortable with this blogging platform and the course I’ve charted for it.  I’ve settled in, pre-written a number of articles, and am looking into getting a push from some guest bloggers,  I’m enjoying the ride so far and am optimistic my readership goals will be met. 

 

Starting a new sustainability, or any, initiative for a company could have a similar path.  Planning the initiative, selecting the right emission measurement tool, and choosing a reduction methodology course are required.  The process will require settling in for some hard work and some outside help or consultants may be needed for a little push now and then.  But the sustainability ride should be rewarding and could be an ever improving process. 

 

Jack in this video didn’t do all this thinking when sledding, he just did it.  What are you doing to move your sustainability initiatives forward in 2010?

And here, I found an appropriate Thomas Edison quote: “I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work.”

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   People   Planet   Practices   Profit   Sustainable Business  

Comments [0]

More Absolute Truth Debates: Wolves and Carp

I noted previously the “absolute truths” of the mountain top mining debate: 

 

Truth #1

In any announcement, article, press release or other communication from a mining company or other industry group, the issue will be framed in the number of jobs being preserved by the proposed mining methodology, the stream loss is minimal, and the communities are strengthened by the schools, hospitals and commerce developments created on the filled land.

 

Truth #2

When the environmentalists speak on this issue, the value of the extracted coal will be minimized, the practice will weaken the community and the ecological damage will be permanent.

Wolf Reintroduction

The Chicago Tribune this week detailed the pitched battle between ranchers and environmentalists regarding the reintroduction of the Mexican wolf in the southwest.  Frustration and resentment has been the result of the ten year program to return the endangered wolf to its native habitat – habitat that is dominated by ranchers and their herds (quite tasty to the wolves). 

 

Wolf Reintroduction Truth #1

In any announcement, article, press release or other communication from a mining ranching company or other industry group, the issue will be framed in the number of jobs being preserved by the proposed mining methodology wolf reintroduction, the stream loss value of the wolf is minimal, and the communities are strengthened by the schools, hospitals and commerce developments created on the filled land tax revenues from ranchers.

 

Wolf Reintroduction Truth #2

When the environmentalists speak on this issue, the value of the extracted coal ranchers’ losses will be minimized, the practice discontinuing the wolf reintroduction will weaken the community and the ecological damage from the wolves’ absence will be permanent. 

Asian Carp Absolute Truths

Asian carp is a voracious eater that crowds out native fish and could damage the ecosystem of the entire Great Lakes.  The State of Michigan is preparing a lawsuit to force the US Army Corps of Engineers to close the locks connecting Lake Michigan to the Mississippi River system in Illinois; the carp has been steadily migrating closer to the Great Lakes.  The fight to protect the Great Lakes from this invasive species has each side crystallizing into absolute truths:

 

Carp Truth #1

In any announcement, article, press release or other communication from an mining ranching Illinois company or other Illinois industry group, the issue will be framed in the number of jobs being preserved by the proposed mining methodology wolf reintroduction river barge traffic, the stream loss value of the wolf  damage from the carp may be minimal, and the communities are strengthened by the schools, hospitals and commerce developments created on the filled land tax revenues from ranchers materials for steel, concrete, fuel, coal and salt. 

 

Carp Truth #2

When the environmentalists State of Michigan speaks on this issue, the value of the extracted coal ranchers’ losses excess trucking of materials around the closed locks will be minimized, the practice discontinuing the wolf reintroduction the Asian carps’ impact to the Great Lakes fisheries and recreational boating industries will weaken the community and the ecological damage from the wolves’ absence carp will be permanent.

 

The coordinator of the wolf reintroduction program noted that one “thing about wolves [mountain top mining/carp] is they bring out extreme emotions and feelings and attitudes, so it is an extra challenge."  What other issues out there are defined by “absolute truths” on each side and bring out extreme emotions?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Planet   Profit   Sustainable Business   Sustainable Legal  

Comments [0]

The 2 Absolute Truths of Mountain Top Mining

A lawsuit was recently settled between two environmental groups and a mining company over whether the coal company can continue the practice of filling of parts of valleys with excess rock and other material.  The mine at issue, according to government figures in the AP report, employs about 70 people.  The settlement allows the mining company to proceed with filling in a valley in exchange for planting an extra 150 acres of hardwood trees on reclaimed land at the mine and donating $50,000 to the Kentucky Fish and Wildlife Foundation. 

Background

The mountaintop removal method of surface coal mining, pioneered in West Virginia, involves the blasting of the soil and rock atop a mountain to expose coal deposits below. While mining operations are ongoing, the overburden is hauled or pushed into adjacent valleys. This excavated overburden is known as "spoil." Once the coal has been extracted, efforts are made to re-contour the mountaintop by replacing the removed overburden, but stability concerns limit the amount of spoil that can be returned to the area. In its natural state, the spoil material is heavily compacted; once excavated, however, the loosening of the rock and soil and incorporation of air causes significant swelling. As a result, large quantities of the blasted material cannot be replaced, and this excess spoil ("overburden") remains in the valley, creating a "valley fill" that buries intermittent and perennial streams in the process.

 

Water that collects in the fill must be moved out to ensure the fill's continued stability. Thus, an underdrain system is constructed by placing large boulders up to and above the ordinary high-water mark of the stream. The collected water is then channeled into a treatment pond, where sediment from the runoff is allowed to settle. Sediment ponds usually are constructed in existing streambeds, using earth and rock to create an embankment. After sediments have settled out of the fill runoff, the treated water is discharged from the sediment pond back into existing streams. When practicable, a sediment pond will be constructed in the streambed immediately adjacent to the end (or "toe") of the fill. But, because West Virginia's steep, mountainous topography often prevents this kind of positioning, a short stream segment is frequently used to move runoff from the fill downstream to the sediment pond. Once a valley fill is stabilized, the embankments of the sediment pond are removed, and the ponds and the stream segments are restored to their pre-project condition.

 

Much of the impact of a valley fill project is felt by headwater streams. Headwater streams are small streams that form the origin of larger streams or rivers, and may be intermittent or ephemeral. Intermittent streams receive their flow from both surface runoff and groundwater discharge, while ephemeral streams rely on major rain or snow events for their flow. The precise role of headwater streams in overall watershed ecology is a matter of some debate…but all parties agree that these streams perform important ecological functions.

Source: Ohio Valley Envtl. Coalition v. Aracoma Coal Co., 556 F.3d 177  (4th Cir. 2009). 

 

The Absolute Truths

Environmental groups appear to have been losing their battle against coal companies and this practice.  Recent cases have supported the US Army Corps’ ability to issue permits for this practice and found that the Corps is considering all the factors required by current law.  Is that why the environmental groups are claiming victory in exchange for 150 trees?

 

Mining groups are now concerned that the US EPA will attempt to influence the Corps’ decision making process.  The mining industry supports the Corps’ regulation of the practice.  The standards used by the EPA under the Clean Water Act would likely restrict this mining practice. 

 

Truth #1

In any announcement, article, press release or other communication from a mining company or other industry group, the issue will be framed in the number of jobs being preserved by the proposed mining methodology, the stream loss is minimal, and the communities are strengthened by the schools, hospitals and commerce developments created on the filled land.

 

Truth #2

When the environmentalists speak on this issue, the value of the extracted coal will be minimized, the practice will weaken the community and the ecological damage will be permanent.     

This issue is not going away as mining companies and environmentalists define this issue as a “way of life” matter – pitching jobs against the environment.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Planet   Practices   Profit   Sustainable Business   Sustainable Legal  

Comments [0]

A Type of Green Impact: Unexpected Regulation

 

I’ve said before that for a sustainable legal strategy and to avoid claims of greenwashing, a company’s claims must be true, not misleading, and substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence.  Add to this simple list: if you make a specific claim regarding the properties of your product, be sure to know whether that claim raises further regulatory requirements. 

 

 

Samsung manufactured keyboards that it claimed contained antimicrobial properties and could inhibit germs and bacteria.  If that claim was false, misleading or not backed up by evidence, Samsung could be in trouble with the Federal Trade Commission. FTC, however, is not who fined Samsung. 

 

The US Environmental Protection Agency regulates pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).  FIFRA requires that all pesticides be registered with the EPA so it can determine that the pesticide, when used in accordance with labeling directions, will not cause unreasonable adverse effects to human health or the environment.  

 

By claiming antimicrobial properties on the keyboard, the Samsung keyboard fell within the EPA’s broad definition of a pesticide: any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest, where a pest is living organisms that occur where they are not wanted or that cause damage to crops or humans or other animals, such as insects, mice and other animals, unwanted plants (weeds), fungi, or microorganisms such as bacteria and viruses. 

 

 

The failure to register the keyboard with the EPA under FIFRA cost Samsung a $205,000 fine. The fine was not based on the keyboards’ inability to fight off critters, just that it was not properly registered.  After having gone through the trouble on your own of verifying your green claims, providing extensive corroborating data and not making misleading statements, wouldn’t you hate to find out that your product is now regulated?  Have your claims reviewed by an experienced attorney.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Greenwashing   Practices   Profit   Sustainable Business  

Comments [0]

Deeper in the Trench

Defining and implementing sustainability practices into a business is a never ending challenge.  Assuming one can influence decision makers to act in the first place, questions such as how to achieve improvements, how to measure progress, how to educate and how to implement sustainability measures provide plenty of trials. 

 

Sustainability offers fertile ground for learning, innovation, and the opportunity to build a better model, according to Angela Nahikian, director of Global Environmental Sustainability at Steelcase.  She recently looked back on the progress of the sustainability movement and offered some thoughts as to what it will take to maintain the movement in an article entitled Exhausted But Inspired: Gleanings From a Sustainability Director in the Trenches. 

 

 

According to Nahikian, continuing efforts from the sustainability trenches must include:

1) translating the collective learning through effective stories and case studies,

2) partnering with the academic community to develop standard frameworks and tools, and

3) actively mentoring the next generation of sustainability practitioners.

 

To this list, I would add:

4) Engage customers in the process.  Ask for ideas on how they utilize your products.  More than just getting a better life-cycle analysis, you’ll probably get a better relationship with your customers. 

5) Set aggressive goals from suppliers.   Change standard RFP forms to implement sustainability goals into subcontracts.  Measure that sustainability criteria as part of your supplier’s compensation. 

 

Establishing a sustainable legal strategy that reflects your corporate vision can indeed be exhausting but inspiring.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Practices   Profit   Sustainable Business  

Comments [0]

Greenwashing 10 Years Ago – How Far Have We Come?

To avoid greenwashing, your sustainable business needs to make ecological claims about its products or services that are true, not misleading, and substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence.

 

I came across an old study from Consumers International that highlighted some problems with green claims.  It has been ten years since this report.  Are consumers still seeing the same things:   

 

  1. Statements are often too general
  2. Statements which ought to be related to a product’s life-cycle frequently are not
  3. Statements tend to be too vague and unconvincing
  4. Statements do not give a real idea about the actual superiority of the product or its life- cycle
  5. Statements are often not relevant to the market in which the product is sold
  6. Claims are not verifiable
  7. There are far too many symbols and logos on products and packaging
  8. Because so many claims are made, and because those claims are not believed, people do not trust the official eco-labels either.

 

It is good to see some trusted names and sources entering the market place.  UL Environment provides independent green claims validation, product certification, training, advisory services and standards development for sustainable businesses.  I have no connection to Underwriters Laboratory other than I know the name from any lamp wires I have in my house and their headquarters is not far from my house so I’ve met a few engineers there who get to blow stuff up from time to time.

 

Credibility is key when it comes to making green claims for your sustainable business.  If you’ve been around for 163 years then there is a little weight to a validation from you.  If not, services like this one from UL will help….if your product has genuine sustainable attributes.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   Greenwashing   Profit   Sustainable Business  

Comments [0]

Five Imperatives for Sustainable Businesses

The Corporate Executive Board published five imperatives every executive must consider to survive in an economic downturn.  Even if the recession is over, the highlights below are always good advice for sustainable businesses: 

 

#1: Improve Cost Discipline: Reduce COGS And Capital Use, Not G&A Spending

·        Focus on cost of goods sold rather than general and administrative expenses to achieve long-term cost discipline.

 

#2: Protect Growth Initiatives: Elevate, Consolidate, and Protect Innovation Funding

·        Incorporate concrete innovation targets into performance expectations and reporting, even amid belt-tightening.

 

#3: Leverage Financial Strengths: Re-envision Your Value Chain as a Capital and Pricing Chain

·        Foster innovations that target the shifting financial strength of customers and suppliers.

·        Use the crisis to price for the true value of intangibles that customers under appreciate.

 

#4: Exploit Risk Opportunities: Embrace, Don’t Eradicate, the Right Risk Exposures

·        Harmonize executive risk tolerances and pursue those opportunities you are uniquely positioned to manage.

·        Evaluate your contract portfolios with an eye toward renegotiating past (and changing future) contract terms.

·        Robustly manage fraud risks by identifying and punishing incidents of misconduct early in the down cycle.

 

#5: Make Critical Talent Plays: Use Today’s Crisis to Court and Cultivate Tomorrow’s Winners

·        Seize the opportunity to close critical skill gaps with “not-in-play” talent.

·        Reward relative outperformance (even if you must court the wrath of executive pay watchdogs).

·        Use the economic crisis to sharpen the acumen of future executives.

·        Re-brand the employment value proposition to recoup productivity losses from suddenly disengaged talent.

·        Embrace offshore centers as a source for critical skills and next-generation executive leadership, not just low-cost execution.

 

These aren’t suggestions.  An imperative is an act or course of action that is demanded of one, as by position, custom, law, or religion: a charge, commitment, duty, must, need, obligation, responsibility. The tag line for the Corporate Executive Board is “What the Best Companies Do.”  What is your sustainable company doing?  How can we help you?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   People   Practices   Profit   Sustainable Business  

Comments [0]